Hard to find neutral OOXML comments

I got dragged into the OOXML debate only in October this year, prior to which I had avoided it in the comfortable (and incorrect) knowledge that it was being taken care of in Australia by people far more in the know than me. While in NZ I was chatting to the folk there who have lobbied hard and resulted in a “no with comments” vote for NZ and I realised I could have a positive impact in getting the debate on track in Australia. After all, Australia abstained from the last vote and we have one last chance come February to make a stand.

The main problem I’ve found as I’ve waded into the dark and murky waters of this topic is that the moment you try to take a logical even-handed approach, you are basically demonised by one or both sides of the debate. If you don’t take the emphatic “OOXML is evil and btw ODF is pure shining light!” approach, then random people in the FOSS community start to question your motives and credibility, which I can tell you, gets old pretty quickly. Particularly after both Jeff and I have spent so many years committed to the progress of FOSS and software freedom both locally and internationally. People don’t seem to understanding that taking an extreme stance puts you squarely on one side of the fence and makes it harder for the people actually making this decision to take what you have to say seriously.

It is like people in the FOSS community saying to Government “you are not using FOSS everywhere already, so you must be getting paid off, there must be a conspiracy! You are all bastards!”, and then wondering some people in Government have reservations about FOSS. Luckily there are a lot of very smart people in Government (in Australia) who are already using, writing policy about, and understanding that a good knowledge of FOSS helps them make more educated decisions about their ICT procurement generally. Which actually helps them choose FOSS where it makes sense, in spite of the loud offensive voices in the community.

Anyway, I am running an OOXML technical feasibility event on Friday in which I have experts from New Zealand and Australia speaking, as well as a variety of industry and community perspectives. The idea of this event is to understand whether OOXML is actually technically feasible (and there is a legal event in the afternoon for the same purpose). I believe that if OOXML is not technically feasible (which many people in the FOSS community take for granted) then it is a simple, practical and non-political reason to have a no vote for Australia.

I just found this blog post which also reflects the frustration felt by many people trying to understand what is going on without all the political wailing on both sides of the fence:

So, what I have gleaned from my researches (though that is probably too strong a word) so far is that while there are some valid discussions to be had, the majority of participants are either staunchly pro-ODF, or they are working for Microsoft. I do know that, were I an end-user, I would remain ignorant – but given the mud flying around, perhaps ignorance is bliss.

I will probably need to keep my mudproof raincoat on for a little while yet.

New Zealand Ministry of Justice Open Source Discussion Paper

Fascinating! Congralutaions to the New Zealand Open Source Society for all their good work! This is a really interesting read and certainly useful for Australia Government agencies.

Knee-jerk prohibition of OSS is no longer feasible or cost-effective. Rather than pretend OSS is a passing fad, or ignore the growth of OSS use because it is a change from past Ministry practices, a rational adoption strategy would:
1) Encourage a selection process for internal adoption.
2) Identify specifically prohibited application types and licencing models.
3) Specify the rules by which in-house developers contribute to open source projects.

Another part of the paper (in the Appendix) is the Open Source policies for the Ministry of Justice:

Policy 1: Open standards
Policy 2: Prefer OSS
Policy 3: Review licences
Policy 4: Formal OSS evaluation
Policy 5: Version
Policy 6: Active development
Policy 7: Commercial support
Policy 8: Enterprise architecture
Policy 9: Release Code Changes (Integrate, Don’t Build)
Policy 10: Documentation

Check out the NZOSS blog post and link for more details.

Do you think about OOXML?

Just one last reminder that there is a free event on this Friday (in two days) that will be delving into the technical and legal feasibility of OOXML. Speakers include both technical and legal experts (and you can attend either session or both) as well as industry and community representation. If you think about OOXML and want to contribute to the discussion please come along.

  • Date: Friday 14 December 2007
  • Time: 8:30-1:00 (technical), 2:00-4:30 (legal) (catering provided)
  • Venue: Room 101, level 1, new Law Building, UNSW lower campus (taxi to main gate, Anzac Pde, second building on left on main walkway)

Please RSVP to feedback [at] cyberlawcentre.org if you want to attend one or both sessions for catering purposes.

Pearcey NSW Young Achievers Award!

On Thursday night we were very pleased and honoured to receive the NSW Pearcey Young Achievers Award! Jeff and I are the first duo to receive the award and it was a real surprise for us 🙂

We dedicated this award to the Open Source community we continue to serve, the many inspirational people we work with from all around the world, the people who support us, and my wonderful parents who have provided so much inspiration and advice 🙂 We also want to dedicate it to the rest of the Seven team, of which we were only 2 people. Seven were the people behind linux.conf.au 2007, the best lca ever.

Also speaking at the award presentation was Pearcey Foundation chairman Ian Dennis who said ever since Trevor Pearcey built Australia’s first computer in 1948 in Sydney, Australia has been leading the world in computers.

“We were bloody good at IT then and we are bloody good at IT now,” Dennis said. “The Pearcey Foundation is about recognizing the fact that we are still damn good in IT and telling people about it.”

Story by Rodney Gedda, Computerworld

In our acceptance speech Jeff also gave a thank you to the Hon John Della Bosca (who couldn’t be there due to being in parliament), who is one of three NSW Ministers to mention Open Source in parliament (courtesy of Hansard).

Just two days to complete the Census!

The Australian Open Source Industry and Community Census 2007 closes in two days, so please get in and complete the Industry Census for your company, and/or the Community Census for yourself, and please let other companies or community members know.

The aim of this project is to raise the profile of our industry and community, so stand up and be counted! Companies have the option to be included in a business directory that lists your skills, contacts details and spiel only, and individuals have the option to be in the running for a GP2X gaming unit.

The report will be freely available in February and distributed to Government and the general public.

Australian political parties views on FOSS

Responding to survey results prepared recently by OSIA, the Australian Labor Party, the Liberal-National Coalition, the Australian Democrats and the Australian Greens have all voiced strong support for the adoption of Free and Open Source Software for both boosting local ICT development and ensuring open and interoperable standards.

Awesome work by Open Source Industry Australia in this excellent little document that outlines the perspectives of all the major parties towards Open Source.

In the answers, Labor refers to their “10 year strategy for software” which was announced in 2004. In it was this little gem:

A 10-year strategy for software and digital content would also be created under a Labor government, Lundy said. This strategy would aim to increase the local software industry’s global market share by focusing on open source development and partnering with SMEs.

The change in Government has provided the FOSS community and industry a real opportunity to get FOSS on the political agenda, and into a meaningful discussion about the broader benefits FOSS can offer both economically and socially to Australia.

Help! Seeking OOXML comments for event

I am helping coordinate the first ever Australian event to really delve into the technical and legal practical feasibility of OOXML. It will be on December 14th, and will include experts from Australia and around the world. The schedule is currently up, however all the speakers names will be published in the coming week. There will also be participation from Microsoft, so if you have outstanding technical or legal questions about OOXML, you should come along and participate! The attendees will be a combination of the general public, academia, standards people and our course domain experts.

It will not be a political event, as there are enough of those around 🙂 The aim here is to have a calm and open discussion about the technical and legal feasibility of OOXML. The top 10 or 20 technical comments of concern brought up from the ISO process will be analysed and industry players will be able to have a say. The end result will be a better understanding about OOXML to help inform those making the final decision on the Australian response to the ISO processing of OOXML in February 2008.

Now to my heading! I have found many people linking to the summary of ISO comments from around the world on OOXML, however it appears that the document is now protected by a password (see document 904, which I would like), as are several other documents that could be helpful for this event. If anyone has a copy of the summary of comments, I would really appreciate a copy so I can pull together the comments of most global concern for this event.