Why Australian trials are important to the OLPC vision

I’ve been asked a few times why OLPC deployments in Australia are relevant to the OLPC vision. I thought I’d do a blog post about what OLPC Friends is trying to achieve in supporting local projects, and why I’ve been so keen to get local trials happening in Australia. Feedback welcome 🙂

  1. Need in Australia – there are many children in Australia who are in serious need. Whether it be in remote Indigenous Australia, or living in poverty in metropolitan areas. Supporting projects for these children is a key goal of OLPC Friends for Australia, New Zealand and throughout the Pacific. The first Australian trial includes some children from extremely disadvantaged communities (including a remote Indigenous family) as well as typical kids to ensure that the technology meets both the specific needs of disadvantaged children as well as the typical education requirements of an Australian school. Details of this trial (including some videos and learning activities) are here.
  2. Funding the Pacific – By rolling laptops out to Australian schools at a premium rate, the funding raised can go directly to Pacific countries who don’t have access to funding or resources to help them with OLPC rollouts and funding volunteers to work on deployments. Then organisations like AusAID can also work in collaboration with education departments to fully fund Pacific projects.
  3. Supporting the Pacific – Throughout Australia and New Zealand there are loads of technical people and educators who are willing to volunteer for helping with OLPC trials right throughout the region. Many of them have already signed up on the OLPC Friends volunteers page. The more people who have skills the better we can support implementers and educators throughout the Pacific to improve both the resources available and the education levels of all children in the region.
  4. Cultural connections – One fantastic opportunity is to use the collaboration tools (such as the Videochat activity) and the ability to connect to another school to connect children up directly. This means opportunities for cultural sharing, awareness and ultimately for opening doors to opportunity and knowledge for children all over the region. We already have schools interested in this kind of cultural exchange, and I’m really excited to be able to facilitate this.
  5. Remote training – One important element of Australia’s first trial is using the connectivity (Videochat, Jabber, Write, etc) to provide remote support to students, in particular literacy training. The learning specialist can provide literacy lessons for children in remote areas that don’t have the local skills for the special education requirements. The OLPC schoolserver (XS) also includes Moodle for eLearning. Building up local resources for remote learning such as literacy, teacher training, and online classes means that the whole region (and world) can benefit and utilise these resources and potentially these services to improve their education and training options.

Basically, I believe that OLPC deployments in Australia and New Zealand can – with appropriate strategic planning and collaboration – have profound and sustainable positive impacts for the Pacific, while also addressing serious and general local needs in each country. I believe this kind of regional approach ensures an organic, sustainable, and ultimately community-oriented strategy.

I also believe that rolling out individual laptops to people when there isn’t that education and school-based approach ultimately doesn’t contribute strongly to the vision of OLPC. As we see many more schools around the world taking on OLPC in the classroom, I think we’ll see that a very large percentage of the value of the technology is only found when all the children in the classroom are connected together and online, and when it is integrated into their normal school curriculum.

Now that anyone can buy laptops in bulk (minimum order 100) for a reasonable price ($219 per laptop to OLPC partner countries and the 50 Least Developed Countries and USD$259 for the rest of the world) in the “Change the World” program, I hope that people will start realising that these devices need to be in the classroom, not in their Christmas stocking. For anyone interested in doing deployments you can check out the OLPC Deployment Guide and if you want any help, check out OLPC Friends and can register, sign up for volunteering, get involved and find others who have skills and interest in the project 🙂 We’re going to start regular online meetings soon, and some face to face meetings in various cities across the region (Adelaide and Wellington already have regular meetings :), so there are plenty of ways to participate.

EDIT: Please note I originally posted incorrect information about the XO pricing but it is definitely cheaper if you are in a partner country or least developed country as defined on the OLPC website here.

8 thoughts on “Why Australian trials are important to the OLPC vision”

  1. @Wayan

    Of course, go for it. I think that when seen in the context of a global (or in our case, regional) strategy, it makes a lot more sense to people.

  2. I kind of hate the argument: we “White Man” give laptops to uneducated natives, and we give them equipment that we would not even use ourselves. What I hate most of all is that, this is kind of what is happening here.

    Having a working Australian trial would help convince other countries that OLPC is a worthwhile technology. Conversely, if the Australian trial goes badly, then we can learn from that and have a good rethink about what the strategy is. It does seem like “netbooks” are hitting the market in Western countries as a result of initial interest in the OLPC project, but now every manufacturer wants to get their products into the market (which is good for competition).

    I suspect that there are a lot of applications for small, rugged, highly portable, low power computers in remote areas. One example is data collection for agricultural science, or possibly the mining industry.

  3. Tel – before the OLPC project existed I recall googling something that today would give you OLPC as a hit, but ending up at a site that specialised in rugged computing for mining. Big waterproof cases, low on metal parts, can bake them in an oven etc, expensive. Slightly different picture to the OLPC vision, replace little kids with burly miners who are just as insensible to delicate technology 🙂

    I recently spent three days down in Melbourne demonstrating XOs for the public, and there were plenty of white, middle class dads that were asking “were can i get one for my kid?”.

    When I was 5, if someone had have handed me a 400mhz laptop, I wouldn’t have known what to think. Since the specs in an XO are similar to the kind that I learned all my IT on, I don’t think this is a case of handing a minority something we wouldn’t use ourselves, just that tech has become mature and cheap enough that we can distribute it to those who can’t have computers as a spending priority in their lives.

  4. @Tel

    Firstly, part of the reason I wanted to do Aussie trials to typical kids was to show that this isn’t just cheap laptops we ourselves wouldn’t use, but rather cutting edge educational tools that all children benefit from. I believe that the technology as a package (apps, ruggedness and the ability to collaborate in and out of the classroom) is the best option for 6-12 year olds, and am trying to bring that to Australia in a way that both assists our most in need and also through a regional sustainable approach helps all children.

    I hate the patriarchal approach to aid too, but any trials done with Indigenous communities would _absolutely_ be done in full consultation and only with the agreement and internal desire from the communities to trial/deploy. I’m actually in talks with some people who have spent their whole lives working with some of the most remote Indigenous communities in Australia and the first step with any community for an OLPC deployment is to show the technology to the appropriate decision makers and see what they think. Then ensure it doesn’t have a negative impact on culture and families, and then ensure it integrates with their education.

    If the first Aussie trial went bad, then I would personally be seriously reconsidering this project and the value it brings to anyone, but the trials have gone well, children are learning and are improving their literacy, numeracy, confidence, programming skills and more. So I think that we have a tool that all children in Australia can use to help themselves and their communities, so I want to be sure our most disadvantaged children get full access where possible and appropriate.

  5. Hey Pipka, super blog, the Change the World page you link to says $259 v. $219 based on country of the school, not the amount requested — which is right?

  6. @Mala

    Sorry all, I modified the blog post to reflect the actual pricing. Sorry for any confusion! The cheaper rate is if you are one of the least developed nations or a “partner country”, which is defined by the link in my updated post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *